#Intel burn test on fx cpus archive
WinRAR: Archive creation with a folder containing 68 files of varying.NOD32: In-depth virus scan of a folder containing 32 files of varying.Photoshop: Image manipulation using a variety of filters, a derivationīenchmark V3 (test image resized to 4500×3499).Custom-built, four-channel variable DC power supply, used to power.Photoshop as an image manipulation benchmark.ĪC Power Analyzer 380803 AC power meter, used to measure system power consumption. It’s also a significant factor for compact builds which can’t offer as much cooling as big towers.Ĭlassic – Home Cinema to play H.264/VC-1 video. This is of great interest to us as the less power it consumes, the lower the thermal demands, and the greater potential for quiet operation. The i7-6700 (non-K) may be slightly better in this regard as it can be purchased for a US$45 less and its TDP is just 65W compared to the i7-6700K’s 91W, suggesting that the vanilla version of the 6700 is more energy efficient. There’s a small early adopter premium for each of these, making the price of this new platform higher than the move from Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge and Ivy Bridge to Haswell. Not only is the chip itself fairly expensive (currently US$370) compared to the performance it delivers, but as it uses a different socket (LGA1151), a new motherboard is required, and switching to DDR4 memory is recommended for additional future-proofing. In our Skylake review, we determined that Intel’s new flagship Core i7-6700K for mainstream desktops is a tremendous performer but does not offer much in the way of value compared to its Haswell-E predecessors.
0 kommentar(er)
